Not even your britches were safe

Not even your britches were safe

There is absolutely no need for men’s underwear to be this funky, it’s plenty funky enough all by it’s lonesome.
Those guys could be wearing kevlar vests and those undershirts would still be visible.

About The Author

Mantooth
AKA Brian Heiler author of "Rack Toys: Cheap, Crazed Playthings" and co-editor of "Toy-Ventures Magazine". Co-Host of the "Pod Stallions" podcast. Host of the Brick Mantooth Youtube channel, painter, designer, writer, mental health advocate, toy collector, Mego, and Mego Knock-Off enthusiast. I have large feet, ADHD and I live in Canada. Talk toys, not others.

9 Comments

  • Wings on April 13, 2009

    The solid colors are passable, although probably a surprising item when they were new.

    But those prints… Wow. Talk about coming out of the closet! Seeing a dude with those on now would be shocking, but can you imagine 30+ years ago??? Yeesh!

  • John III on April 13, 2009

    That is just God-Awful. Maybe only pimps or drug kingpins wore them. “Say hello to my little friend!”

  • rob! on April 13, 2009

    Oh dear god…

    Is it safe for clones to have sex with each other, which this picture clearly implies?

  • Hairball on April 13, 2009

    My eyes! My eyes!!

  • beth on April 13, 2009

    Is that a Pyramide du Louvre in his pants or is he just gla….oh jeez. That is just so wrong.

  • Anonymous on April 14, 2009

    Wow, they’re so hairy. I guess they’re the epitome of 70’s macho men. Now you don’t see one hair on a male model.

  • blueroc85 on June 5, 2009

    I luv that they tuck their undershirts into their underwear! LOL!

  • Anonymous on August 3, 2009

    Mr. blonde model is trying to pick out a serious wedgie! Unavoiadable in tight 70's fasion.

  • Anonymous on November 3, 2009

    what size chest are those yellow piss catcher's?

Leave a Reply