<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sizzling Print Knits	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://plaidstallions.com/reboot/sizzling-print-knits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://plaidstallions.com/reboot/sizzling-print-knits/</link>
	<description>Reboot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2019 18:40:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://plaidstallions.com/reboot/sizzling-print-knits/#comment-10452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plaidstallions.com/reboot/index.php/2018/06/25/sizzling-print-knits/#comment-10452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, no, no, no... this was defintiely not the Bus Station Creep line. Mantique had that market sewn up tight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was as close as catalogs dared get to explicitly targeting the gay market of the time. No snarkiness here, either. It&#039;s fascinating entirely from a historical perspective, the kind of tone the copy-writers used, aiming for &#034;the assertive male who knows fashion.&#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, the photographers deliberately avoided selecting the tougher-looking men who usually conveyed a ruggedly masculine archetype during that era... the kind of guy that Joe Average could look at and think, &#034;Yeah! If I buy this polyester knit shirt, somehow I&#039;ll start looking more like him!&#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Instead they chose younger, more sensitive-looking models a very different demographic would look at and think much the same thing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number Three, sporting the floral print shirt looks very much like Rudolph Nuryev the ballet star who was a HUGE heart-throb in the gay world during the late 60s and most of the 70s. Even by today&#039;s standards, Nuryev would be considered a knock-out. Trim, toned, incredible muscle definition, cheekbones that would cut paper, and utterly shameless.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On a related point, let&#039;s all breathe a huge sigh of relief the &#034;Double-Feature&#034; look never caught on. Even on a conventionally attractive model it looks awful. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, no, no, no&#8230; this was defintiely not the Bus Station Creep line. Mantique had that market sewn up tight.</p>
<p>This was as close as catalogs dared get to explicitly targeting the gay market of the time. No snarkiness here, either. It&#39;s fascinating entirely from a historical perspective, the kind of tone the copy-writers used, aiming for &quot;the assertive male who knows fashion.&quot;</p>
<p>Further, the photographers deliberately avoided selecting the tougher-looking men who usually conveyed a ruggedly masculine archetype during that era&#8230; the kind of guy that Joe Average could look at and think, &quot;Yeah! If I buy this polyester knit shirt, somehow I&#39;ll start looking more like him!&quot;</p>
<p>Instead they chose younger, more sensitive-looking models a very different demographic would look at and think much the same thing. </p>
<p>Number Three, sporting the floral print shirt looks very much like Rudolph Nuryev the ballet star who was a HUGE heart-throb in the gay world during the late 60s and most of the 70s. Even by today&#39;s standards, Nuryev would be considered a knock-out. Trim, toned, incredible muscle definition, cheekbones that would cut paper, and utterly shameless.</p>
<p>On a related point, let&#39;s all breathe a huge sigh of relief the &quot;Double-Feature&quot; look never caught on. Even on a conventionally attractive model it looks awful. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
