<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 1977 REMCO Toys Catalog	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://plaidstallions.com/reboot/1977-remco-toys-catalog-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://plaidstallions.com/reboot/1977-remco-toys-catalog-2/</link>
	<description>Reboot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2021 23:07:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DBenson		</title>
		<link>https://plaidstallions.com/reboot/1977-remco-toys-catalog-2/#comment-12939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DBenson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2021 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plaidstallions.com/reboot/?p=16535#comment-12939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1977 was the year Disney produced a new Mickey Mouse Club. Note the MMC logo on the belt and box, but not on the Disney figures or their packaging. Hedging their bets? In any case, the new show was pretty cheesy and even this Disney fanatic gave up on it a few weeks.The new show&#039;s animated bits put Mickey in a hip 70s jumpsuit, so I&#039;d regard the jeans as a lesser offense. 

A Mickey Mouse utility belt would have made a certain amount of sense in relation to comic books, where Mickey was having adventures when not puttering around the suburbs. Disney comics were bigger in other countries -- were the utility belt and/or other Remco Disney marketed abroad?

As an almost-boomer I associated Remco with science kits in canisters labeled &quot;The Thinking Boy&#039;s Toy&quot;; also with fancier stuff like the Jonny Reb cannon, the drive-in movie (which I desperately wanted until I saw an actual photo), and the Showboat (which I did have. Decades later was very distressed to see the Showboat classified as a girl&#039;s toy). Also associated Remco with gold foil labels pressed onto the plastic -- a sign of class. Then toys fell off my radar for a while. 

I could never quite believe it was the same Remco making those McDonaldland figures. Those were not aimed at the Thinking Boy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1977 was the year Disney produced a new Mickey Mouse Club. Note the MMC logo on the belt and box, but not on the Disney figures or their packaging. Hedging their bets? In any case, the new show was pretty cheesy and even this Disney fanatic gave up on it a few weeks.The new show&#8217;s animated bits put Mickey in a hip 70s jumpsuit, so I&#8217;d regard the jeans as a lesser offense. </p>
<p>A Mickey Mouse utility belt would have made a certain amount of sense in relation to comic books, where Mickey was having adventures when not puttering around the suburbs. Disney comics were bigger in other countries &#8212; were the utility belt and/or other Remco Disney marketed abroad?</p>
<p>As an almost-boomer I associated Remco with science kits in canisters labeled &#8220;The Thinking Boy&#8217;s Toy&#8221;; also with fancier stuff like the Jonny Reb cannon, the drive-in movie (which I desperately wanted until I saw an actual photo), and the Showboat (which I did have. Decades later was very distressed to see the Showboat classified as a girl&#8217;s toy). Also associated Remco with gold foil labels pressed onto the plastic &#8212; a sign of class. Then toys fell off my radar for a while. </p>
<p>I could never quite believe it was the same Remco making those McDonaldland figures. Those were not aimed at the Thinking Boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
